Local image and video generation performance comparison
Check whether you can create thumbnails, posters, image transformations, photo visualizations, and audio short forms with local equipment in terms of creation time and memory requirements.
comparable items
- expected time to generate one result
- difference based on output resolution and video length
- GPU memory loading status and necessity of offloading
- Expected power consumption per generation
Tasks possible on local devices
- Generate multiple thumbnails and sians
- Create posters and product images with text chunks
- Transform and synthesize based on reference image
- Turn a single photo into a short video
- Creating short-form content with dialogue and sound effects
image generation model
- FLUX.2 [klein] 4Bfast sketch, thumbnail, repeated generation
- FLUX.2 [klein] 9B9B model for image generation
- Qwen-Image-2512poster, mixed Korean-English image, realistic representation
- FLUX.2 [dev] 32Bimage with multiple objects
video generation model
- MiniMax H3-Baseshort-form with dialogue and sound effects, control over first and last frames
- LTX-2.5 Audio Videoa local pipeline that generates audio and video at once
- HunyuanVideo-1.5a short video applied with motion to a single image
- Wan2.2 TI2V-5B24GB graphics card for 720p video generation
MiniMax H3 local scope
This comparison includes only the local execution of the public H3-Base at 768p. Context understanding and 2K regeneration stages are excluded from local generation time.
Generation time may vary significantly depending on the execution tool, driver, number of steps, and offloading, so use it for equipment comparisons under identical conditions.